Triggering China Permanent Establishment Status for Short-Term Expatriate Employees

By Dezan Shira & Associates

Posted: 6th February 2013 12:58

Care is required when assessing the PE boundaries when engaging in short-term projects in China without possessing a legal establishment in the country
 
With many foreign companies with no China presence sending expatriate staff on short term contracts to work in the country, special consideration needs to be paid to what constitutes triggering permanent establishment (PE) status, and the increased tax liabilities of doing so. The details for how this occurs vary, and are buried in the details of the many and various double tax agreements that China has with other countries.
 
In double taxation agreements (DTAs), the concept of permanent establishment determines whether a contracting state can tax the business profits of a resident enterprise of the other contracting state.
 
A PE generally refers to “a fixed place of business through which the business of an enterprise is carried on in a country.” However, PE also includes the provision of services by an enterprise through the dispatch of its employees or other personnel to the Contracting State if it continues within the Contracting State for a period or periods aggregating more than six months or 183 days within any twelve month period.
 
Currently, China has DTAs in place with 97 countries plus Hong Kong and Macau. Previous DTAs adopt the six months rule, while new DTAs utilize the 183 days rule. Countries adopting the six months rule include Switzerland, Norway, Italy, France, U.S., Germany, New Zealand and the UK. Countries adopting the 183 days rule include Singapore, Hong Kong, Macau, Belgium, and Finland.
 
How are six months counted?
According to Circular No. 403, provision of services in China for a single day in a month is considered as provision of services for that entire month. However, if no expatriate is in China to perform relevant services for 30 consecutive days, one month is deducted.
 
This method of calculation was invalidated in January 2011. However, there has been no regulation replacing it so far and tax authorities continue to adopt this method of calculating the six month period.
 
How are 183 days counted?
Circular 75, released by the SAT in September 2010, provides a detailed interpretation of the 2007 DTA between China and Singapore, and is often applied to similar provisions in China’s many other tax treaties.
 
We can examine the China-Singapore DTA as a case study below:
 
According to Circular 75:
 
 
As reflected in the table below, the threshold for constituting a PE is much lower under the six month rule. Therefore, depending on whether the six months rule or 183 days rule applies, the result of whether a PE is constituted varies.
 
 
Dezan Shira & Associates is a specialist foreign direct investment practice, providing corporate establishment, business advisory, tax advisory and compliance, accounting, payroll, due diligence and financial review services to multinationals investing in emerging Asia. Since its establishment in 1992, the firm has grown into one of Asia’s most versatile full-service consultancies with operational offices across China, Hong Kong, India, Singapore and Vietnam as well as liaison offices in Italy and the United States.
 
For further details or to contact the firm, please email info@dezshira.com or visit www.dezshira.com.

Related articles



Comments


close

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up here and get the latest news and updates delivered directly to your inbox

You can unsubscribe at any time